Portrait of Kevin Jarbo (September 2021)

Portrait of Kevin Jarbo (September 2021)

Peace and greetings! As of Fall 2021, I am an Assistant Professor in the Social and Decision Sciences Department at Carnegie Mellon University. I also co-direct the Data-Driven Diversity (D3) Lab in the Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences.

After completing an undergraduate degree in biological sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, I went into human brain imaging research and later earned my PhD in psychology and cognitive neuroscience at CMU in 2018.

My current research focuses on how stereotype threat–a worry or concern about being judged based on negative stereotypes–impacts students’ decisions to seek help and procrastinate in academic settings.


More about Me…

I have also worked in CMU’s Center for Student Diversity and Inclusion where my efforts centered on the experiences and development of Black men in college.

For folks who are seeking training on equity and inclusion in the workplace, I have recently become a Certified Trainer licensed to facilitate workshops using Paloma Medina’s Neurology of Equity and Inclusion for Systemic Change program. Details on how to schedule a workshop are forthcoming, and I’m more than happy to connect with anyone interested in learning more!

Other than that, I am a sneaker enthusiast with a few dozen pairs–boots and dress shoes included. I love sneakers and I appreciate them as a form of artistic expression and projection of my style and personal values.


Current Research Projects

RSF_STmodel.png

Understanding the Impact of Stereotype Threat on Academic Help-Seeking and Procrastination

How do identity-threatening social signals impact our future decision making and behavior?

Project Overview In this line of research, I seek to expand our understanding of stereotype threat effects by shifting focus from purely academic outcomes to the everyday decisions and behaviors of students from negatively stereotyped groups in academic settings. Specifically, students experiencing stereotype threat may choose not to seek help and increase procrastination in order to avoid potential threats to their identity. By leveraging widely used stereotype threat interventions that can affect the appraisal of identity-threatening situations to focus on benefits, rather than costs, I hope to promote student help seeking and reduce procrastination in academic contexts.

Across academia, relatively poor inclusion and retention of women and people from underrepresented racial groups (URG; e.g., Black, Hispanic or Latinx) in STEM fields poses a major challenge for society, effectively excluding historically marginalized groups of people from high earning professional careers. Given widespread negative stereotypes about the academic ability of women and URGs, a Black student might opt to skip a white professor’s office hours, or a female student might drop out of a degree program once finding she is the only woman in any of her classes.

Stereotype threat can lead to avoidant behavior wherein a person may become reluctant, or even refuse, to engage in common social interactions because they may worry about confirming, or being judged in light of, a negative stereotype about a group with which they identify. Even worse, negatively stereotyped students may experience stereotype threat regularly, like microaggressions and microinvalidations, and its detrimental effects can persist after a single threat to affect more than just academic outcomes, but academically relevant decision making and behavior as well.

The model depicted above shows a potential mechanism that explains how stereotype threat can increase avoidance during decision making processes that ultimately lead to avoidant behaviors, like decreased help seeking and increased procrastination, in order to avoid potentially negative social experiences and emotions. If stereotype threat does function in this way, then I also hope to show that reliable and widely used stereotype threat interventions can shift student’s appraisals of threat. By emphasizing the benefits over the costs of a potentially identity-threatening situation, students may become more willing to seek help and procrastinate less in academic scenarios.

This project is currently in progress and funded by the Russell Sage Foundation.

 
ch3_fig1_theory.png

Context, Costs, and Uncertainty Drive Loss Avoidance

How does context impact our behavior when we make risky decisions?

Project Summary This line of research builds on my PhD work to investigate how uncertainty and risk during decision making leads to avoidant behavior. With my colleagues Rory Flemming and Dr. Tim Verstynen, I developed a novel spatial decision making task called “Danger Zone” where participants had to use a computer mouse to select the center of a target to score as many points as possible while avoiding a nearby non-target that was associated with a penalty. In one study, we showed that increasing uncertainty–making it harder to identify the center of the target–made people avoid the non-target significantly more.

Together with Dr. David Colaço and Dr. Tim Verstynen, I followed up Danger Zone by framing the task as a moral dilemma, “Drone Strike”, where participant selections corresponded to either executing a drone strike on enemies on a battlefield while allies were nearby or delivering ammunition to allies with enemies nearby. When executing a drone strike vs. delivering ammunition, this study showed that context also matters when people make decisions in risky contexts. Namely, people avoided the non-target more when they perceived the kind of loss on the task corresponded to the potential to harm allies on a drone strike rather than a failure to help allies on an ammunition delivery. Overall, given that we had people doing the exact same thing in the drone strike and ammunition delivery contexts (i.e., selecting the center of a visual target), what kind of loss people were avoiding also influenced how much they tried to avoid a potential loss.

The “Drone Strike” project was funded by the John Templeton Foundation through the Summer Seminars in Neuroscience and Philosophy (SSNAP) Fellowship Program at Duke University.

Read more about these studies here.

 
neon-style-coming-soon-glowing-background-design_1017-25516.jpg

Investigating Links between Moral Disposition and Moral Action Behavior

Why don’t people actually act how they say they would when faced with a moral dilemma?

Project Overview Project description in progress. In the meantime, email me (kjarbo@cmu.edu) to learn more.

 
neon-style-coming-soon-glowing-background-design_1017-25516.jpg

Exploring How Social Attitudes Affect Rule Application

How do our beliefs and biases influence inequitable judgments and decisions about others?

Project Overview Project description in progress. In the meantime, email me (kjarbo@cmu.edu) to learn more.


Ongoing Collaborations

neon-style-coming-soon-glowing-background-design_1017-25516.jpg

Stereotype Threat Perseverance

Does the impact of experiencing an instance of stereotype threat persist over time and across situations?

Project Overview Project description in progress. In the meantime, email me (kjarbo@cmu.edu) to learn more.

 
neon-style-coming-soon-glowing-background-design_1017-25516.jpg

Examining Critical Experiences in Student Paths to Math Success

How do students’ experiences learning math influence their academic sense of belonging and use of resources to succeed in math?

Project Overview Project description in progress. In the meantime, email me (kjarbo@cmu.edu) to learn more.

 
MomentsAtWork_Interface2.png

Moments@Work

Can a gamified, low-stakes intervention increase people’s willingness to discuss and confront workplace bias and discrimination?

Project Overview Project description in progress. In the meantime, email me (kjarbo@cmu.edu) to learn more.